Note: you are viewing the archived version of our website. Click here to go to our new site.

Comparing the GTAP-MRIO and WIOD Databases for Carbon Footprint Analysis

Title
Comparing the GTAP-MRIO and WIOD Databases for Carbon Footprint Analysis
Author(s)
Iñaki Arto
José M. Rueda-Cantuche
Glen P. Peters
Year
2014
Type
Journal Article
Source
Economic Systems Research, Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages 327-353
DOI
10.1080/09535314.2014.939949
Abstract
We explore two different worldwide multi-regional input-output (MRIO) databases (Global Trade Analysis Project-MRIO and World Input-Output Database) for the calculation of the global carbon footprint (CF) of nations. We start our analysis with a description of the main characteristics of the databases and then make a comparison between their main components. Then, we calculate the CF with both databases and identify (from a global perspective) the most relevant factors underlying their differences using structural decomposition analysis. On average, certain parts of both databases (e.g. intermediate uses and final demand) can be said to be similar for around 75% to 80%, with only a few elements in each part mainly driving the major differences. The divergences in the datasets of four countries explain almost 50% of the differences in the CF (the USA, China, Russia and India). Industry-wise, 50% of the differences can be explained by the divergences in electricity, refining and inland transport industries.
More Information
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2014.939949

Tags

Back Incorrect or incomplete information? Click here to report this.

This website provides meta data on papers and other publications, with links to the original publications. These papers may be copyrighted or otherwise protected by the publishing journal or author. Some journals provide open access to their publications. When possible we will try to include abstracts and more details for open access publications. For more details, follow the link to the original document and/or contact the publisher/author.